Cases 21 - 30 of 938
Barker v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2021cv00627
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vacsular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James A Barker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Trevino v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2021cv00636
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Trevino
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vacsular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ray v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 5:2021cv00526
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Plaintiff:
Dan Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2021cv00527
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Plaintiff:
Undre C Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Long v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv00255
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyer et al v. Boston Scientific Corp
as 3:2020cv01152
Plaintiff:
David Milton and Lorrie Boyer
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc, Tissue Science Laboratories Ltd and Boston Scientific Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pieterick v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 5:2020cv01043
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Pieterick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arrowood v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 5:2020cv01037
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 inclusive, C R Bard Inc, McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
James Arrowood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2020cv00168
Plaintiff:
Earl Lee
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haley v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv00587
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Haley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
