Cases 1 - 10 of 40,759
Carl et al v. Ivoxy Consulting, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Jordan Carl and Rachel Carl
Defendant:
Ivoxy Consulting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sauls v. Dallas Police Dept et al
as 3:2024cv01420
Plaintiff:
Precious S Sauls
Defendant:
Dallas Police Dept and NFN Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. Hyster
as 24-20268
Plaintiff:
Calvin Williams
Defendant:
Hyster-Yale Group, formerly known as NACCO Industries, Incorporated., doing business as Hyster
Calvaruso v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv00483
Petitioner:
Amanda Calvaruso
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. Caljan America, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00110
Defendant:
Caljan Inc., Caljan America, Inc. and Caljan Rite-Hite America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tracie Diane Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Coleman v. Cartiva Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00970
Plaintiff:
Cathy Coleman
Defendant:
Cartiva Inc, Wright Medical Group NV and Stryker B V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Alexander v. Key City Capital
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Keith Alexander
Defendant:
Key City Capital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Muir v. Walmart Inc
as 3:2024cv01439
Plaintiff:
Bonita Muir
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. Employee John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Emrit v. Combs
as 24-40247
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean Combs, also known as P. Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Goodall et al v. Barber Brothers Contracting Company, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2024cv01485
Plaintiff:
Robert Goodall and Erika Williams
Defendant:
Barber Brothers Contracting Company, L.L.C., Southern Paving Co., Inc. and Caterpillar Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
