Cases 71 - 80 of 143
Harrison v. Franklin, et al.
as 4:2017cv01869
Plaintiff:
Connie Harrison
Defendant:
Alicia Franklin, Robert E Newey, Charley Prine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Plano ISD et al
as 4:2016cv00799
Plaintiff:
Bennie P Washington
Defendant:
Plano ISD, Steve Neill, ATPE - Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Washington v. Plano ISD et al
as 3:2016cv02905
Plaintiff:
Bennie P Washington
Defendant:
Plano ISD, Steve Neill, ATPE - Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pean v. Iasis Healthcare Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv02283
Plaintiff:
Alan Pean
Defendant:
Iasis Healthcare Corporation , SJ Medical Center , City of Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Izaguirre v. Caudle Law Office, PC
as 7:2016cv00023
Plaintiff:
Dario Izaguirre
Defendant:
Caudle Law Office, PC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charboneau v. Collin County Court at Law, No 6
as 4:2016cv00093
Plaintiff:
Janine Charboneau
Defendant:
Collin County Court at Law, No 6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grigsby v. City Of Texarkana Texas
as 5:2016cv00016
Defendant:
City of Texarkana Texas, City of Texarkana Texas Police Department and Brent Lawing
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Grigsby and Dennis Grigsby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Martinez v. Kyle Law Firm
as 4:2015cv03611
Plaintiff:
Waldemar Josue Luciano Martinez
Defendant:
Kyle Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Traywick v. Medical University of South Carolina et al
as 4:2015cv00775
Plaintiff:
Wayne Traywick
Defendant:
Medical University of South Carolina, Hood Law Firm and Robert S. Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Hays County District Attorney Office et al
as 1:2015cv00916
Defendant:
Whitney Borgman, Judge Glicker, Hays County Court of Law and others
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
