Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Newson v. Douglas et al
as 3:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Devoris Newson
Defendant:
Richard D. Douglas, Robert W. Wedemeyer, Camille R. McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lu v. Reyes et al
as 3:2023cv02721
Plaintiff:
Yan-Xu Lu
Defendant:
Sean D Reyes, Kyle J Kaiser, J Clifford Petersen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pickens v. City of Laurel et al
as 2:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Deontae Pickens
Defendant:
City of Laurel, City of Laurel Police Department, Tommy Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Council et al v. Hood et al
as 3:2020cv01618
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Monica Zahn and others
Plaintiff:
Roshell Pickens and Kenneth Council
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Texas Christian University et al
as 3:2020cv00106
Defendant:
Dr. Fredrick Gooding, Dr. Diane Snow, Russell Mack and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe No.1, Jane Doe No 1, Destinee Wilson and others
Petitioner:
Megan Pickens
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pickens v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv00913
Plaintiff:
James Pickens
Defendant:
Management & Training Corporation and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickens v. ITT Educational Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01196
Plaintiff:
Charles Pickens
Defendant:
ITT Educational Services, Inc. and Michael Fletcher, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tate v. Lafayette County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2011cv00204
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Tate
Defendant:
Lafayette County, Mississippi, Mike Pickens, Johnny Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickens v. Okolona Municipal Separate School District
as 1:1969cv00056
Plaintiff:
George Pickens
Defendant:
Okolona Municipal Separate School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
