Cases 91 - 100 of 41,909
Hurley v. TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00155
Petitioner:
Freddy Hurley
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00263
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ramirez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carson v. State of Texas
as 4:2024cv00186
Petitioner:
Michael James Carson
Respondent:
State of Texas and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Director
as 5:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Reidie Jackson
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leal v. Lumpkin, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00372
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Leal
Respondent:
371st District Court of Tarrant County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kindred v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00219
Petitioner:
Herman Lee Kindred
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pool v. Garcia
as 7:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
Jeffery Lamont Pool
Respondent:
Juan Garcia and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nettles v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00980
Petitioner:
Donovan Nettles and Donavan Nettles
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01546
Petitioner:
Johnny Richardson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hubert v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00082
Petitioner:
Lawrence Israel Hubert
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
