Cases 11 - 20 of 36
James Kelley v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-11744
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES LE'ROY KELLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Ware v. Hawthorn et al
as 1:2016cv00489
Petitioner:
Ulysses T Ware
Respondent:
Zack J Hawthorn, Marcia A Crone, David A O'Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Kelley v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2016cv00427
Petitioner:
Shadrick Jarian Kelley
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelley v. Davis
as 2:2016cv00314
Petitioner:
Everett Kelley, III
Respondent:
Lori Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelley v. Davis
as 6:2016cv00047
Petitioner:
Everett Kelley, III
Respondent:
Lori Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelley v. Davis
as 1:2016cv00532
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Tommy Joe Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
William Kelley v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-20226
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM DAVID KELLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Kelley v. Stephens
as 1:2016cv00346
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Tommy Joe Kelley
Respondent:
Brad Livingston
Defendant:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelley v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2015cv03079
Petitioner:
James Le'Roy Kelley
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID and Stuart Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelley v. State of Texas
as 5:2015cv00675
Defendant:
Bexar County Sheriff
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Willie J. Kelley
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
