Cases 11 - 20 of 305
Taylor v. Fuentez
as 1:2023cv00064
Petitioner:
Christopher Reid Taylor
Respondent:
FNU Fuentez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Myers v. Taylor County Sheriff
as 1:2023cv00062
Petitioner:
Kevin Marlon Myers and A. Liberty. Freeman
Respondent:
Taylor County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Molinar v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Rafael Arturo Molinar
Defendant:
Taylor County Jail, FNU White, FNU Cockeroll and others
Respondent:
FNU Wittington, Jordan Magee, Judge Jeff Propst and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Bickham
as 23-30115
Petitioner / Appellant:
Darrell Taylor
Respondent / Appellee:
Edward Bickham, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute
Taylor v. Lumpkin
as 23-40104
Petitioner / Appellant:
Richard Wayne Taylor
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Taylor v. The State Of Texas et al
as 4:2023cv00648
Petitioner:
Byron Taylor
Respondent:
The State Of Texas and Harris County Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor v. FBOP
as 1:2022cv05949
Petitioner:
Versiah M Taylor
Respondent:
Warden of F B O P
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor v. Lumpkin
as 22-40692
Petitioner / Appellant:
Richard Wayne Taylor
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Kerley v. Jacobs
as 5:2022cv05574
Plaintiff:
Taylor Jackson Kerley
Defendant:
Linton Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor v. USA
as 1:2022cv05374
Plaintiff:
Versiah M Taylor
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
