Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Williams v. Thaler
as 4:2010cv03776
Petitioner:
James Williams
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Norsworthy v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-40908
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES WILLIAM NORSWORTHY
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
James Norsworthy v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-40698
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES WILLIAM NORSWORTHY
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
James Norsworthy v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-40668
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES WILLIAM NORSWORTHY
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
James Davis v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-40264
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES WILLIAM DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Norsworthy v. Thaler
as 1:2009cv01015
Petitioner:
James William Norsworthy
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norsworthy v. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00902
Petitioner:
James William Norsworthy
Respondent:
Nathanial Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norsworthy v. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00849
Petitioner:
James William Norsworthy
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00589
Petitioner:
James William Thompson
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2009cv00243
Petitioner:
James William Davis
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
