Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Vargas v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2012cv00022
Respondent:
Attorney General, Federal Bureau of Prisons, G.E.O. and others
Petitioner:
Francisco Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vargas v. Thaler
as 1:2011cv00860
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Petitioner:
Celestino Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vargas v. Cabrera et al
as 1:2011cv00080
Plaintiff:
Maria Del Rosario Vargas
Defendant:
Eliseo Cabrera, Janet Napolitano, Eric Holder, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vargas et al v. Freeman et al
as 1:2011cv00001
Plaintiff:
Maria Del Rosario Vargas and Alicia Garcia Martinez
Defendant:
Michael T Freeman , Eliseo Cabrera , Hillary Rodham Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rodrigo Vasquez v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-20127
Petitioner - Appellant:
RODRIGO VARGAS VASQUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Rodrigo Vasquez v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-20078
Petitioner - Appellant:
RODRIGO VARGAS VASQUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Vargas v. Dixon
as 5:2009cv00252
Petitioner:
Juan Vargas
Respondent:
Kevin Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Vargas-Sanchez v. Pearson
as 5:2009cv00182
Plaintiff:
Romualdo Vargas-Sanchez
Defendant:
Bruce Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vasquez v. Quarterman
as 4:2009cv01389
Petitioner:
Rodrigo Vargas Vasquez
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vargas v. USA
as 5:2008cv00141
Petitioner:
Michael Riojas Vargas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
