Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Currie v. Stephens
as 1:2014cv00067
Petitioner:
Earl F. Currie
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Curry v. Stephens
as 3:2014cv00098
Petitioner:
Rodney Lynn Curry
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Raines v. Stephens
as 1:2014cv00100
Respondent:
Warden G. Currie and William Stephens
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Dalawrence Raines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Stephens
as 4:2013cv02369
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Addon Curry
Defendant:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Pounds et al
as 1:2013cv00149
Petitioner:
James Curry, Jr.
Respondent:
Pounds , Lee County , Monroe County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Stephens
as 4:2013cv02201
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Addon Curry
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzales v. Warden Currie
as 2:2013cv00057
Petitioner:
Edward Gonzales
Respondent:
Warden Currie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aundraye Curry v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 13-10181
Petitioner - Appellant:
AUNDRAYE CURRY
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Curry v. MDOC et al
as 1:2013cv00020
Petitioner:
James Curry, Jr.
Respondent:
MDOC and The Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2012cv05136
Petitioner:
Aundraye Marcellas Curry
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
