Cases 41 - 50 of 66,672
Barragan Farias v. USA
as 3:2024cv01136
Petitioner:
Jorge Luis Barragan Farias
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Vidal v. USA
as 3:2024cv01135
Petitioner:
Tommy Ray Vidal
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Corrales v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00168
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Corrales
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Duarte-Vasquez v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Duarte-Vasquez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Baker v. Sheriff, Jefferson County
as 1:2024cv00173
Petitioner:
Thomas C. Baker
Respondent:
Sheriff, Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Lumpkin
as 24-10419
Petitioner:
Marcus Quin Butler
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Mousavi v. Mayorkas et al
as 4:2024cv01775
Plaintiff:
Mr. Ali Mousavi
Defendant:
Director Alejandro N. Mayorkas, US ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK GARLAND, Mr. Randy Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Crawford v. Lumpkin
as 24-50371
Petitioner:
Avery B. Crawford
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Billingslea v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01140
Petitioner:
Darrell Bernard Billingslea
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. USA
as 2:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
Isaac Hernandez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
