Cases 1 - 10 of 350
Neri v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01378
Petitioner:
Jaime Rodriguez Neri
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Jorge Alberto Rodriguez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Lumpkin
as 24-50392
Petitioner:
Jesus Rodriguez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Rodriguez v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Abraham Salomon Rodriguez
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robertson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Laneil Robertson
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Michael W Collier, Jennifer S Crozby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrientes v. Warden USP Pollock
as 23-30896
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jesus Rodrigues Barrientes, also known as Jesus Rodriguez Barrientes
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden USP Pollock
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00427
Petitioner:
Carlos Manuel Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rodriguez-Oviedo v. State of Texas
as 1:2023cv01336
Petitioner:
Alfredo Rodriguez-Oviedo
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez-Rodriguez v. Day et al
as 2:2023cv05060
Plaintiff:
Jorge Sanchez-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Travis Day
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2023cv00371
Petitioner:
Chyee Rodriguez
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
