Cases 1 - 10 of 486
Cruz-Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-70003
Petitioner:
Obel Cruz-Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Delacruz v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
Isidro Miguel Delacruz
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wells v. Lumpkin
as 24-70002
Petitioner:
Amos Wells
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Granger v. Lumpkin
as 24-70001
Petitioner:
Bartholomew Granger
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Ricks v. Lumpkin
as 23-70008
Petitioner:
Cedric Allen Ricks
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Renteria v. Lumpkin
as 23-70007
Petitioner / Appellant:
David Santiago Renteria
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and State of Texas
Lizcano v. Lumpkin
as 23-70006
Petitioner / Appellant:
Juan Lizcano
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Brown v. Lumpkin
as 23-70004
Petitioner / Appellant:
Micah Brown
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Medina v. Lumpkin
as 23-70003
Petitioner / Appellant:
Anthony Medina
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Thomas v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2023cv01005
Petitioner:
Steven Alan Thomas
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
