Cases 161 - 170 of 481
Ronald Sutherland v. William Stephens, et al
as 15-20616
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD DAVID SUTHERLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, WARDEN SMITH, WARDEN CARTER and others
Sepeda v. Stephens et al
as 6:2015cv00307
Defendant:
Debra G. Brock, Whitney Franks, Fernando Fuster and others
Plaintiff:
Enedelia A. Sepeda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ware v. Stephens
as 7:2015cv00153
Plaintiff:
Robert Dale Ware
Defendant:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darrell Roberts v. Lynaugh Unit Facility, et al
as 15-51000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL ROBERTS
Defendant - Appellee:
LYNAUGH UNIT FACILITY, WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, GLEN WHITFIELD and others
Haufler v. Stephens et al
as 6:2015cv00909
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Haufler
Defendant:
William Stephens, Charles Grasti, Raymond Carlos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trejo v. Stephens et al
as 4:2015cv03059
Plaintiff:
Juan Trejo
Defendant:
William Stephens, Troy Selman, Jessica E. Shelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshaun Robinson v. William Stephens, et al
as 15-41401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARSHAUN LYNN ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, JOHN A. RUPERT, Warden, LOGAN D. ELKINS, Correctional Officer and others
Edwards v. Martin et al
as 2:2015cv00306
Plaintiff:
La'Derrick Edwards
Defendant:
Barry Martin, Dustin Owens, Wilbur Kemph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Stephens
as 2:2015cv00304
Plaintiff:
Stephen Silas Thomas
Defendant:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Driver v. Linthicum et al
as 4:2015cv03005
Plaintiff:
Raymond N. Driver
Defendant:
Lanette Linthicum, Warden Jones, Warden Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
