Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Dixon v. Collier et al
as 6:2021cv00220
Defendant:
Allen S Barker, Bobby Lumpkin, Timothy C Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Lee Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy, Sr. v. Wright et al
as 6:2019cv00510
Defendant:
Lt. Michael L Odom, MHC Lyndsey Howell, Sgt. FNU McAndrews and others
Plaintiff:
Prince McCoy, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Collier-TDCJ Executive Director et al
as 1:2018cv00208
Defendant:
FNU Almanza, FNU LNU, Kevin D Foley and others
Plaintiff:
Toby Kristopher Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis, et al v. Vannoy et al
as 3:2018cv00650
Defendant:
Kevin Benjamin, Barrett Boeker, Tim Delaney and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Davis and Unknown Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ancar v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2017cv00913
Plaintiff:
Allen Ancar
Defendant:
Barrett Boeker, Butch H. Browning, Jimmy Guidry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. Logan et al
as 1:2017cv00387
Plaintiff:
Colton Barrett
Defendant:
Jesse W Logan, Clay A Anderson, Michael J Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jules v. Vannoy et al
as 3:2017cv00503
Defendant:
Barrett Boeker, Jarvis Callihan, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Jules
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2017cv00128
Defendant:
Barrett Boeker, James Callihan, Unknown Hebert and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Vannoy et al
as 3:2016cv00858
Plaintiff:
Shannon Alexander
Defendant:
Barrett Boeker, Daniel Stewart and Darrol Vannoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Anderson et al
as 3:2016cv00775
Defendant:
Linda Anderson, Barrett Boeker, Chad Menzina and others
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
