Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Lathem v. Dockery et al
as 4:2017cv00609
Plaintiff:
Teresa Lathem
Defendant:
Dewayne Dockery, Barry K Caver, Denton County Health Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booker v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 7:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dewayne Booker
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Gross and Cynthia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Aramark Inc et al
as 4:2017cv00824
Plaintiff:
Aaron Thomas
Defendant:
Aramark Inc and Commissary/Icaregifts.com
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justice v. Bexar County Jail et al
as 5:2016cv01088
Defendant:
Aramark Commissary Provider, Bexar County Jail and University Health Detention Services
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Administrative Segregation et al
as 5:2016cv00113
Plaintiff:
Dayrin L Robinson
Defendant:
Administative Segregation, The Inmate Grievance Office, Aramark Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGary v. Ramon et al
as 6:2016cv00009
Plaintiff:
Billy McGary, Jr
Defendant:
Maria Ramon and Aramark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marlon Smith v. Bexar County Sheriff's Office, et al
as 15-50413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARLON SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
BEXAR COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, RAUL BANASCO, Jail Administrator and ARAMARK
Smith v. Bexar County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2015cv00008
Defendant:
Aramark, Raul Banasco and Bexar County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Marlon Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence Thompson v. Adrian Garcia, et al
as 14-20505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE EDWARD THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ADRIAN GARCIA, UNNAMED OTHER EMPLOYEES OF HARRIS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and ARAMARK MAINTENANCE
Thompson v. Garcia et al
as 4:2014cv01624
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Edward Thompson
Defendant:
Adrian Garcia , Unnamed Other Employees of Harris County Sheriff's Office and Aramark Maintenance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
