Cases 31 - 40 of 65
David Schoor v. Mike Brown, et al
as 17-11027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID G. SCHOOR
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE BROWN, Attorney at Law, JUDGE BRADLEY UNDERWOOD, Lubbock County Courthouse, DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Fowler v. Guyton et al
as 4:2017cv02665
Plaintiff:
Ricky Dean Fowler
Defendant:
Sheronda Guyton, A. Isaac and David G. Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Pierce v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 17-40517
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, DAVID G. GUTIERREZ and BOBBY LUMPKIN
Schoor v. Brown et al
as 5:2017cv00093
Plaintiff:
David G Schoor
Defendant:
Mike Brown, Bradley Underwood, District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eduardo Hernandez v. TDCJ, et al
as 17-40397
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDUARDO HERNANDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLE, TEXAS CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES and others
Hammond v. Collier et al
as 4:2016cv03603
Plaintiff:
Benny J. Hammond
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, David G Gutierrez and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammond v. Collier et al
as 6:2016cv01337
Plaintiff:
Benny J. Hammond
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, David G Gutierrez and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv01190
Plaintiff:
Isaac Felipe Hernandez
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ayala v. Livingston et al
as 6:2016cv01144
Plaintiff:
Jesus Ayala
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, David G Gutierrez and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Livingston et al
as 6:2016cv01105
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Pierce
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, David G Gutierrez and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
