Cases 41 - 50 of 79
Taylor v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00060
Defendant:
Clarence Anthony, Norman Clarkson, Richard Clinton and others
Plaintiff:
Courtney Fitzgerald Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conlan v. Montgomery County Mental Health Treatment Facility et al
as 4:2013cv02007
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adam Conlan
Defendant:
Montgomery County Mental Health Treatment Facility, GEO Group, Inc., Unknown Guard No. 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schery v. Justice et al
as 1:2012cv00186
Plaintiff:
Wilfredo Schery
Defendant:
David G. Justice, Dwight Sims, GEO Group Inc Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. The GEO Group, Inc.
as 5:2011cv01134
Plaintiff:
Raymond Scott Johnson
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perdigone v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2011cv00932
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and The GEO Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ralph Perdigone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Araiza v. GEO Group, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00207
Plaintiff:
Jose Garcia Araiza
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Araiza v. GEO Group, Inc.
as 5:2011cv00864
Plaintiff:
Jose Garcia Araiza
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Naranjo v. Thompson et al
as 4:2011cv00105
Defendant:
George Zoly, Sheriff Arnulfo Gomez, Anne Newman and others
Petitioner:
USA
Plaintiff:
Mario Naranjo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oriakhi v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00175
Plaintiff:
Daniel Oriakhi
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., David Justice, James Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. GEO Group, Inc et al
as 1:2011cv00380
Plaintiff:
Ronnie W Barber
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc, George Zoley, Virgil Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
