Cases 51 - 60 of 158
Peucker v. Cano et al
as 1:2020cv00063
Defendant:
Bradley Johnson, Crystal Reyes, Leeroy Cano and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Andrew Peucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Seagraves Police Department et al
as 5:2019cv00269
Defendant:
Seagraves Police Department, Matthew Bradley Zalewski, Brnet Grundstrom and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dugas v. The United States Of America et al
as 2:2019cv00302
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Dugas
Defendant:
David J. Bradley, The State Of Texas, Erick Echavarry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. Nash et al
as 4:2019cv03864
Defendant:
L. Bronikowski, Shane Nash, J. Castroz and others
Plaintiff:
Meria James Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Leadon v. Collins et al
as 6:2019cv00364
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Leadon, Jr.
Defendant:
LVN Gideon Oputy, CCO FNU Lambo, Director Bryan Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bogus v. Davis et al
as 6:2019cv00278
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, LeeAnn Spears-Hollis, Jimmy Bowman and others
Plaintiff:
Brett David Bogus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Harria County Jail et al
as 4:2019cv01939
Respondent:
Harria County Jail
Plaintiff:
Bradley Garrett
Defendant:
Micheal A. Piper, Harris County Sheriff Dept. and Harris County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cardenas-Lira v. Bradley et al
as 2:2019cv00143
Defendant:
James Burdette, John Doe, David J Bradley and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Fernando Cardenas-Lira
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cardenas-Lira v. Bradley et al
as 1:2019cv00533
Defendant:
David J. Bradley, James Burdette, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Fernando Cardenas-Lira
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roach v. Cerliano et al
as 6:2019cv00216
Plaintiff:
Raymond Bradley Roach
Defendant:
Tony Monsiavais, Jeff Calloway, Maxey Cerliano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
