Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Clark v. Bass et al
as 3:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Hank E Clark
Defendant:
Nolen Bass and A Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annis v. Hanks
as 4:2023cv03279
Plaintiff:
Rocky Annis
Defendant:
George C Hanks, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. United States
as 22-20246
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael G. Peters and Dalton G. Peters
Defendant / Appellee:
United States, U.S. Southern District Court, George C. Hanks, Jr. and others
Peters v. USA
as 22-20180
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael G. Peters
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, United States District Court Southern District of Texas Houston Division, George C. Hanks, Jr. and others
Peters et al v. United States et al
as 4:2022cv00762
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Peters and Dalton G Peters
Defendant:
United States, U.S. Southern District Court, George C Hanks, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. United States et al
as 4:2022cv00733
Plaintiff:
Michael G Peters
Defendant:
United States, U. S. Southern District Court, George C Hanks, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Doornbos et al
as 4:2020cv03910
Defendant:
Channel Four (4) News (NBC), Charles Hankes, Jennifer Elaine Doornbos and others
Plaintiff:
William Curtis Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berkley v. Spain et al
as 5:2020cv00186
Defendant:
Deputy L Montgomery, Ex Deputy Daniel Spain and Sheriff Terry Morgan
Plaintiff:
Hank Berkley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanks v. Singh et al
as 1:2018cv00022
Plaintiff:
Davin Ryan Hanks
Defendant:
Ramen Singh, George Edmond Smith and Sandra Sibley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davin Hanks v. Casey McVea, et al
as 17-30577
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVIN HANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
CASEY MCVEA and RAMAN SINGH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
