Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Shepherd v. Saunders et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Kernelius Marquis Shepherd, Sr.
Defendant:
M.D. Frank Saunders, Michael White, Angela N Chevalier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Squires v. Jones et al
as 4:2022cv03073
Plaintiff:
Vikki Lynn Squires and Justin Michael White
Defendant:
Chris Jones, East Montgomery County Gazette, Conroe Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Delone et al
as 1:2020cv00484
Defendant:
Lori Walker, Emma Davis, Rachel Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Prince McCoy, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winding v. Jones et al
as 3:2013cv00509
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Simone Jones , R. Davis , Catherine Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winding v. Houston et al
as 3:2013cv00449
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Tonya Houston , Christopher Wansley, R. Pepper Crutcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Davis et al
as 3:2013cv00433
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
R. Davis, S. Dunn, C. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Tew et al
as 3:2013cv00430
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
S. Tew , R. Rice , F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Tew et al
as 5:2013cv00430
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
S. Tew , R. Rice , F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Evan et al
as 3:2013cv00385
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Tyeasa Evan, F. Shaw , F. Ovalle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Harbin et al
as 3:2013cv00286
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
A. Harbin , C. Dykes , F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
