Cases 91 - 100 of 314
Winding v. Harbin et al
as 4:2013cv00014
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
A. Harbin, C. Dykes, F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Breakfield et al
as 4:2013cv00011
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
J. Breakfield, F. Ovalle, F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2013cv00006
Plaintiff:
James Lee Mack, Jr.
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher Epps, GEO Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Breland v. Epps et al
as 3:2012cv00888
Plaintiff:
Rory Breland
Defendant:
Christopher Epps and Sheila Flancher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Breckfield et al
as 4:2012cv00197
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
J. Breckfield, R. Wallace, F. Ovalle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster v. Epps et al
as 3:2012cv00858
Plaintiff:
Melissa Elaine Webster
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt Sparkman, James Holman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shannon v. M.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2012cv00814
Plaintiff:
James Maurice Shannon
Defendant:
M.D.O.C., Christopher Epps, Weodia Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Epps et al
as 5:2012cv00160
Plaintiff:
Kevin Russell
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt Sparkman, Robert Sturdivant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garner v. Epps et al
as 3:2012cv00769
Plaintiff:
James Emory Garner
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt L. Sparkman, James Holman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins v. Murphy et al
as 3:2012cv00746
Plaintiff:
Ocie Hoskins, Jr.
Defendant:
Tiffany Murphy, Christopher Epps and James Holman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
