Cases 11 - 20 of 197
Haralson v. Thomas et al
as 3:2023cv00433
Plaintiff:
Walter Jeton Haralson
Defendant:
Tamera Sherneil Thomas, Andrew McGahey, Esq. Graham P. Carner and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guidry v. Terrebonne Parish Criminal Justice Complex et al
as 2:2023cv02958
Plaintiff:
Dwayne P. Guidry, Jr.
Defendant:
Terrebonne Parish Criminal Justice Complex and Rhonda Ledet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Creppel v. Cashio et al
as 3:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
Jean Paul Creppel
Defendant:
J.P. Cashio, P. Smith and Cynthiya Park
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Louisiana State Penitentiary
as 3:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Wade P. Jackson
Defendant:
Louisiana State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Augusme v. Warden, Pollock USP
as 1:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Louisson Augusme
Defendant:
Warden U S P Pollock, J Dickson and Whitley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Minor v. U S P Pollock et al
as 1:2023cv00157
Plaintiff:
Herman Minor, III
Defendant:
U S P Pollock, Officer Whitley, Lt Dickson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sencial v. Lopinto et al
as 2:2022cv04235
Plaintiff:
Steven Jay Sencial
Defendant:
Joseph P. Lopinto, Deputy Chief Monfra, Correct Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pruett v. Pollock
as 1:2022cv05797
Plaintiff:
Dylan Lee Pruett
Defendant:
U S P Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cribbs v. Pollock
as 1:2022cv05796
Plaintiff:
Corey James Cribbs
Defendant:
U S P Pollock, Bolden, Duffel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Davis v. Reed et al
as 3:2022cv00856
Plaintiff:
Troy Davis
Defendant:
P Reed, Joseph Westbrook, Unknown Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
