Cases 21 - 30 of 33
James Curry, Jr. v. Gradie, et al
as 13-60798
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES CURRY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT UNKNOWN GRADIE, OFFICER MCNEIL, JAMES HOLMON and others
James Curry, Jr. v. Mississippi Dept of Corr, et al
as 13-60790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES CURRY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, State of Mississippi, LEE COUNTY CIRCUIT, MONROE COUNTY CIRCUIT and others
Curry v. EMCF MDOC Director et al
as 4:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
James Curry
Defendant:
EMCF MDOC Director, Staff Host of Them, Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Byrd et al
as 5:2013cv00196
Plaintiff:
John Murry Curry
Defendant:
R. Byrd, Frank Shaw, Deloris Spinks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Health Assurance Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01045
Plaintiff:
John William Barrett
Defendant:
Health Assurance Inc. , Carl Reddix , Carl Faulk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Health Assurance Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00153
Plaintiff:
John William Barrett
Defendant:
Health Assurance Inc., Carl Reddix, Carl Faulk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry, Jr. v. Gradie et al
as 4:2013cv00144
Plaintiff:
James Curry, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Gradie, Unknown McNeil, James Holmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Sanders et al
as 3:2013cv00555
Plaintiff:
Marshall Brian Chandler
Defendant:
Kevin Sanders, John Doe # 1, Ricky Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. MTC, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00032
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
MTC, Inc., H. Hollie, T. Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Hollie et al
as 4:2013cv00030
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
H. Hollie, T. Naylor, M. Powe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
