Cases 31 - 40 of 107
Chisholm v. Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv00929
Defendant:
J. Lamar Shaw, Cynthia Griffin, Deputy Warden Chaz White and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Dewayne Chisholm
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Adams County MS Sheriff Department et al
as 5:2019cv00085
Defendant:
Board of Supervisors of Adams County, MS, Captain Tony Nickles, Adams County MS Sheriff Department and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Elijha T. Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crain v. Mancuso et al
as 2:2019cv01033
Defendant:
Tony Mancuso, Warden Burkhalter and Warden Miller
Plaintiff:
Derlon K Crain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Nichols et al
as 5:2019cv00036
Defendant:
Sheriff Travis Patten and Jail Administrator Tony Nichols
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Andrew Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teague v. Fairley et al
as 1:2019cv00254
Plaintiff:
Tony Dewayne Teague
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
John Moran and Bobby C. Fairley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Surrena v. Adams County Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2019cv00122
Defendant:
Kevin Bailey, Tony Nichols, Boddy Powell and others
Plaintiff:
Toby Surrena
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Nichols et al
as 5:2019cv00008
Defendant:
Travis Patten and Tony Nichols
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Andrew Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Patten et al
as 5:2018cv00131
Defendant:
Travis Patten and Tony Nichols
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Andrew Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinkston v. Hall et al
as 5:2018cv00103
Defendant:
Larry Lee, Jerry Williams, C/O C. Hughey and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Chaz D. Pinkston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Donold et al
as 3:2018cv00309
Plaintiff:
Kendrick D. Reed
Defendant:
Tony Donold and Patrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
