Cases 1 - 10 of 181
Bownes v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Bownes
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Jim Hood, Ralph Doxey and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bownes v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Bownes
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Jim Hood, Ralph Doxey and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Epps et al
as 3:2017cv00856
Plaintiff:
Cleveland E. Johnson
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps and Shannon Warnock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wedgeworth v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2017cv00730
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, M.D.O.C., Christopher B. Epps and others
Plaintiff:
Wiley Wedgeworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zachary Johnson v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 17-60447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ZACHARY JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, JOHNNIE DENMARK, MARY DIXON and others
Soloman Kennedy v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 16-60593
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOLOMAN STEVE KENNEDY
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, JUAN SANTOS, DOCTOR UNKNOWN BURKE and others
William Gaskin v. Christopher Epps, Commissioner, et al
as 16-60182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM LEWIS GASKIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DOCTOR RON WOODALL and DOCTOR GWEN WOODLAND
Thomas Ellis v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 15-60752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EARL ELLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, PHIL BRYANT, SERGEANT BARTEE and others
Ellis v. Epps et al
as 1:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Ellis
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Phil Bryant, Unknown Bartee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Hearn v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 15-60238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HENRY HEARN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS and CECIL MCCRORY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
