Cases 21 - 30 of 77
Russell v. CEMEX, Inc., et al.
as 4:2017cv01831
Plaintiff:
Joseph Russell
Defendant:
CEMEX Inc. , CEMEX Management, Inc. and CEMEX Construction Materials Houston, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Miles v. Morgan et al
as 3:2017cv00453
Plaintiff:
Scott Miles
Defendant:
Charlie W. Morgan, Jr. and Russell Bozeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goza v. ProActive Partners Inc et al
as 3:2017cv00559
Plaintiff:
Deborah Goza
Defendant:
ProActive Partners Inc, Maxine Vigil Russell and Lawrence Edward Russell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
White v. Reem International Inc.
as 4:2017cv00342
Defendant:
Reem International Inc.
Plaintiff:
Russel White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Armstrong-Head v. ProActive Partners Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00207
Plaintiff:
Eleanor Armstrong-Head
Defendant:
ProActive Partners Inc. , Maxine Vigil Russell and Lawrence Edward Russell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Russell Metting v. Tierra Lease Service, LLC
as 5:2017cv00044
Plaintiff:
Russell Metting
Defendant:
Tierra Lease Service, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Russell v. Nationwide Eviction, LLC
as 4:2017cv00008
Plaintiff:
Dan Russell
Defendant:
Nationwide Eviction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Russell Cervantes, et al v. Cotter & Sons, Incorporated, et al
as 16-50646
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUSSELL R. CERVANTES, STEPHANIE FAZ, DANIEL YOUNG and others
Defendant - Appellee:
COTTER & SONS, INCORPORATED, JAMES ADAM COTTER and JAMES COTTER, SR.
Russell v. Courtroom Sciences Inc et al
as 3:2016cv01307
Plaintiff:
Diana Russell
Defendant:
Courtroom Sciences Inc and CSI Litigation Psychology LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Cox v. Expeditors & Production Services Co
as 6:2016cv00454
Plaintiff:
Thomas Cox , Russell Wayne Hauck , Dustin Henson and others
Defendant:
Expeditors & Production Services Co
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
