Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Kelvin Wells v. Michael Astrue, et al
as 11-30620
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELVIN WELLS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, STATE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, DISABILITY DETERMINATIONS and others
Lewis v. Secretary of Health and Human Services DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN REMANDED.
as 4:2011cv02043
Plaintiff:
Abraham Lewis, Jr
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wells v. Astrue et al
as 3:2010cv00729
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, Disability Determinations, State Department of Children and Family Services and others
Notice Only:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Robert Henderson v. Department of Health and Human
as 09-10863
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT R. HENDERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Dangerfield v. Department of Health and Human Services
as 2:2009cv00335
Plaintiff:
Lionell Dangerfield, Lionell Dangerfield and Lionell Dangerfield
Defendant:
Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jones v Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services
as 6:2008cv00186
Plaintiff:
Amy C. Jones
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Simon v. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 2:2008cv00725
Plaintiff:
Virginia H. Simon
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Fee v. Department of Health and Human Services
as 2:2007cv03782
Plaintiff:
Carol Tilly Fee and Carol Tilly Fee
Defendant:
Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
