Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Siantou v. JP Morgan Chase
as 24-10650
Plaintiff:
Stephane J. Wantou Siantou
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Company, doing business as Chase Bank, more properly identified as JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Tivoli II, L.P. v. Prudential-Bache Properties, Inc., et al
as 2:2020cv02552
Plaintiff:
Tivoli II, L.P.
Defendant:
Women's Vision Foundation, Prudential-Bache Properties, Inc., BMO Harris Bank N.A. and others
Not Classified By Court:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, M.A. as successor to Bank one Investment management Group as trustee for the Richard E. Summers Marital Trust, ILA Jo Bales, as successor to Herbert O. Acott, Joyce M. Perrin, as administratrix of the estate of Vincent R. Perrin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Ayati-Ghaffari v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2018cv00617
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Chase Home Finance, LLC.
Plaintiff:
Feysal Ayati-Ghaffari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Muralidharan Krishnan, et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 17-41286
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MURALIDHARAN KRISHNAN and INDIRAGANDHI KENTHAPADI
Defendant - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TURNER & ENGEL, L.L.P., GREG BERTRAND, Substitute Trustee and others
Krishnan, et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, et al
as 4:2015cv00632
Plaintiff:
Muralidharan Krishnan and Indirangandhi V Kenthapadi
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. , Barrett Daffin Frappier Truner & Engel, LLP , Greg Bertrand and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA, et al v. John Gidner
as 13-10798
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Garnishee - Appellee:
EDWARD D. JONES & COMPANY, L.P., JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATED, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN D. GIDNER
Esoterick, Inc et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 4:2007cv02824
Plaintiff:
Esoterick, Inc and Dennis Thompson
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
