Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Carey v. Lowe's Companies, Inc.
as 4:2021cv03263
Plaintiff:
Bryan Carey
Defendant:
Lowe's Companies, Inc.
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2021cv01220
Defendant:
Lowe's Companies Inc. and Jeffrey Green
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Cameron et al v. Alpine Exploration Companies Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00684
Plaintiff:
Parish of Cameron
Intervenor:
LA Attorney General and LA Dept of Natural Resources
Defendant:
Alpine Exploration Companies Inc , Apache Oil Corp , Atlantic Richfield Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones et al v. KPMG, LLP et al
as 1:2017cv00319
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jones , Joseph Charles Lohfink , Sue Beavers and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Martha Ezell Lowe
Defendant:
KPMG, LLP and Transamerica Retirement Solutions Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lowe v. Wells Fargo & Company
as 3:2016cv00165
Plaintiff:
Ardenia Lowe
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Lowe v. British Petroleum et al
as 2:2016cv04003
Plaintiff:
Tory Anthony Lowe
Defendant:
British Petroleum and BP
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Thomas Jones v. Singing River Hlth Service
as 16-60263
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARTHA EZELL LOWE, indvidually and on hehalf of a class of similarly situated employees
Defendant - Appellant:
KPMG, L.L.P.
Cameron v. Alpine Exploration Companies Inc et al
as 2:2016cv00531
Plaintiff:
Parish of Cameron
Defendant:
Alpine Exploration Companies Inc , Atlantic Richfield Co , B E P C O L P and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richard Lowe v. Carolyn Colvin
as 14-50342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD L. LOWE
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Lowe v. Colvin
as 5:2013cv00145
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Lowe
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
