Cases 31 - 40 of 677
Ipsen Biopharm Ltd et al v. Galderma Laboratories LP et al
as 3:2023cv02593
Plaintiff:
Ipsen Biopharm Ltd and Ipsen SA
Petitioner:
Ipsen Pharma SAS
Respondent:
Galderma Laboratories, L.P. and Galderma Research & Development, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Galderma Laboratories LP
Defendant:
Galderma Research & Development LLC
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Mellor et al v. Construction Dispute Resolution Services, LLC
as 2:2023cv07015
Plaintiff:
Peggy Mellor, William Mellor, Christopher Collins and others
Defendant:
Construction Dispute Resolution Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0205 - Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
Stewart Development, LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London et al
as 2:2023cv07303
Plaintiff:
Stewart Development, LLC
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. AMR-53446-06, Indian Harbor Insurance Company, General Security Indemnity Company of Arizona and others
Counter Claimant:
QBE Specialty Insurance Company and Steadfast Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0205 - Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
Regional Finance Corporation of Texas v. Medina
as 7:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Regional Finance Corporation of Texas d/b/a Regional Finance
Defendant:
Martina A. Medina
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Walmart Stores Texas v. Pete
as 23-40676
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Walmart Stores Texas, L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellant:
David R. Pete
St. James Parish School Board v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, et al
as 2:2023cv06638
Counter Defendant:
St. James Parish School Board
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, Indian Harbor Insurance Company, QBE Specialty Insurance Company and others
Counter Claimant:
General Security Indemnity Company of Arizona
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0205 - Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
Costco Wholesale Corporation v. Burns
as 4:2023cv01061
Respondent:
Leticia Burns
Petitioner:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
La Belle Maison Associates LLC et al v. Amrisc, LP et al
as 2:2023cv06440
Plaintiff:
La Belle Maison Associates LLC, Bou Mikael Enterprises Inc and Sami Bou-Mikael
Counter Defendant:
Marta Bou-Mikael
Defendant:
Amrisc, LP, HDI Global Specialty SE, Old Republic Insurance Company and others
Counter Claimant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Indian Harbor Insurance Company, QBE Specialty Insurance Company and others
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0205 - Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
Transportation Consultants, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London et al
as 2:2023cv06585
Plaintiff:
Transportation Consultants, Inc. doing business as TCI Trucking
Counter Claimant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Indian Harbor Insurance Company and Steadfast Insurance Company
Defendant:
QBE Specialty Insurance Company, General Security Indemnity Company of Arizona, United Specialty Insurance Company and others
Counter Defendant:
Transportation Consultants, Inc.
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0205 - Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
Sunbelt Innovative Plastics, LLC et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London et al
as 2:2023cv06194
Plaintiff:
Sunbelt Innovative Plastics, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Opti-Com Manufacturing Network LLC
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London, Steadfast Insurance Company, United Specialty Insurance Company and others
Counter Claimant:
Indian Harbor Insurance Company, QBE Specialty Insurance Company, General Security Indemnity Company of Arizona and others
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0205 - Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
