Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Nathan Thomas v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv01488
Plaintiff:
Charnissa Nathan Thomas
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Yeager v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00619
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Nathan Yeager
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Liggins v. Saul
as 3:2019cv00193
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Nathan Renard Liggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cook v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv00601
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Plaintiff:
Nathan Neal Cook
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Roe v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv00255
Plaintiff:
Richard Nathan Roe
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Clemmons v. Commissioner, SSA
as 4:2016cv00417
Plaintiff:
Nathan Daniel Clemmons
Defendant:
Commissioner, SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Hebert v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2016cv00013
Plaintiff:
Nathan Adam Hebert, Sr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McDaniel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2015cv00156
Plaintiff:
Nathan L. McDaniel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brooks v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2015cv02280
Plaintiff:
Nathan P Brooks
Defendant:
U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Poole v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv00258
Plaintiff:
Nathan Poole, Sr.
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
