Cases 11 - 20 of 292
USA v. Franklin, III
as 23-40608
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Robert Leon Franklin, III
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Digital Licensing Inc. et al
as 3:2023mc02984
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Digital Licensing Inc. a Wyoming corporation doing business as DEBT Box, Jason R. Anderson, Jacob S. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Aguilar v. 1st Franklin Financial Corporation
as 4:2023cv03359
Plaintiff:
Timothy Aguilar
Defendant:
1st Franklin Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Toth Enterprises II, P.A et al v. Forage et al
as 1:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
Toth Enterprises II, P.A doing business as Victory Medical & Family Care, Dr William Franklin, DO Katherine Keller and others
Defendant:
Jean-Pierre Forage, Lewis Nichols, Clay Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Franklin
as 23-50101
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Shancey Franklin
Celeste v. Intrusion Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00307
Defendant:
Intrusion Inc., B. Franklin Byrd, Jack Blount and others
Plaintiff:
James Celeste and Andrew Bronstein
Consolidated Plaintiff:
George Neely and Joan Neely
Petitioner:
Esmond L. Dominick and John Bryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ramirez-Lemus v. Garland
as 22-60484
Petitioner:
Franklin Josue Ramirez-Lemus and Ever Noe Cruz-Lemus
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
State of Louisiana v. i3 Verticals
as 22-90050
Respondent:
State of Louisiana, By and Through its Division of Administration, East Baton Rouge Law Enforcement District, Claiborne Parish Law Enforcement District and others
Petitioner:
i3 Verticals Incorporated, i3 Verticals, L.L.C., i3-Software & Services, L.L.C. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
