Cases 11 - 20 of 210
USA v. Spencer
as 23-11077
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Charles Glenn Spencer
USA v. Spencer
as 23-11062
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Charles Glenn Spencer
USA v. Metz
as 23-30411
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Glenn Metz, also known as Shorty, also known as Jeeper
Horizon Bank SSB v. Patrick et al
as 1:2023cv00691
Plaintiff:
Horizon Bank SSB
Defendant:
Dan Patrick, Dade Phelan, Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas, in his official and indivial capacities, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Glenn et al
as 3:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Brittany J. Glenn, Celia C. Glenn, Nicholas L. Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Centennial Bank v. Holmes, et al
as 5:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Centennial Bank
Defendant:
Jerry "Bud" Holmes, Jay House, Channing Baisley and others
USA v. Rentfrow
as 23-60054
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Aaron Matthew Rentfrow, also known as Mongo and William Glenn Chunn
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine et al v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al
as 2:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant:
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, M.D., Janet Woodcock, M.D. and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Danco Laboratories, LLC and Danco Laboratories LLC
Amicus Curiae:
The Chattanooga National Memorial for the Unborn, Doctors for America, American Center for Law and Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
