Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Harris County, Texas v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00733
Defendant:
AKORN, INC., ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., SANDOZ, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Slidell v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 2:2019cv11771
Defendant:
Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc., Mallinckrodt, LLC, Anda, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Slidell and Slidell City
Not Yet Classified:
JM Smith Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Town of Pearl River v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 2:2019cv11775
Defendant:
Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc., Mallinckrodt, LLC, Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Town of Pearl River
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington Parish Government v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 2:2019cv11626
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., West-Ward Pharmaceutical Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Washington Parish Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UCB, Inc. et al v. Mylan, Inc. et al
as 4:2014mc02999
Plaintiff:
UCB, Inc., UCB Pharma GMBH, Research Corporation Technologies, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mylan, Inc. , Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., , Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC and others
Movant:
University%20Of%20Houston
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Warner Chilcott Public Limited Company
as 4:2013mc00025
Plaintiff:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Warner Chilcott Public Limited Company
Movant:
Galderma Laboratories, L.P.
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Warner Chilcott Public Limited Company
as 4:2013mc00015
Plaintiff:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Movant:
Galderma Laboratories, L.P.
Respondent:
Warner Chilcott Public Limited Company
Dr. Patricia J. Sulak v. Watson Laboratories, Inc.
as 1:2011mc00871
Defendant:
Famy Care Ltd., Lupin Pharmaceuticals Inc., Lupin, Ltd. and others
Movant:
Dr. Patricia J. Sulak
Plaintiff:
Teva Women's Health, Inc.
Respondent:
Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
