Cases 11 - 20 of 29
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 22-11086
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G. Andren, Tactical Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Blackhawk Manufacturing Group, Incorporated, doing business as 80 Percent Arms
Defendant / Appellant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae:
District of Columbia, Brady, 16 Major Cities and others
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 22-11071
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G. Andren, Tactical Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae:
District of Columbia, Brady, State of New Jersey and others
Fund Texas Choice et al v. Paxton et al
as 1:2022cv00859
Plaintiff:
Fund Texas Choice, The North Texas Equal Access Fund, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity and others
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Susan R. Deski, Julie Renken and others
Amicus Curiae:
Physicians For Reproductive Health, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Moates v. Biden et al
as 6:2022cv00626
Plaintiff:
Michael Steven Moates
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., State of Georgia, State of Louisiana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State Of Texas et al v. Rising Eagle Capital Group LLC et al
as 4:2020cv02021
Plaintiff:
State of Arkansas, State of North Carolina, State Of Texas and others
Defendant:
John C Spiller, II, JSQUARED TELECOM LLC, Jakob A Mears and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Braidwood Management Inc. et al. v. Xavier Becerra et al.
as 4:2020cv00283
Plaintiff:
John Kelley, Kelley Orthodontics, Joel Starnes and others
Defendant:
Steven T. Mnuchin, Alex M. Azar II, Eugene Scalia and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Illinois, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
State of Texas v. USA
as 19-10011
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF IOWA, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF OHIO, 483 FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED TRIBAL NATIONS, ILYA SOMIN and others
Not Classified By Court:
FOUNDATION FOR MORAL LAW
Polansky et al v. Executive Health Resources Inc. et al
as 1:2018mc00331
Interested Party:
Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC
Defendant:
Executive Health Resources Inc.
Movant:
M.D., M.P.H. Jesse Polansky and United States of America
Plaintiff:
M.D., M.P.H. Jesse Polansky, The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, The Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Respondent:
Seton Medical Center
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
In re: USA, et al
as 16-40795
Petitioner:
In re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, R. GIL KERLIKOWSKE, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Respondent:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
State of Texas, et al v. USA, et al
as 16-40796
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, R. GIL KERLIKOWSKE, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
JANE DOE #1, JANE DOE #2 and JANE DOE #3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
