Cases 11 - 18 of 18
In re: David Wills, et al
as 15-41131
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID WILLS and JAMES SALMON
Respondent:
ARIZON STRUCTURES WORLDWIDE, L.L.C., JOHNSON-MARCRAFT, INCORPORATED, RON SCHARF and others
Drake v. Ramos
as 4:2015mc01959
Plaintiff:
E Drake
Defendant:
Rodolfo Ramos, Jr, Evangalina V Mote, Jason A. Zimmerman and others
Wills et al v. Arizon Structures Worldwide, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00193
Plaintiff:
David Wills and James Salmon
Defendant:
Arizon Structures Worldwide, LLC, Johnson-Marcraft, Inc., Ron Scharf and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Shecka Williams v. USA, et al
as 11-30033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHECKA WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FAWNDA WILLIAMS, RODNEY WILLIAMS and others
Creditor - Appellee:
CHANDRA WILLS
Redmon et al v. Griffith et al
as 2:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
Kathy Redmon and Jimmie D Redmon
Defendant:
Valta R Griffith, R G Griffith and Citizens National Bank of Wills Point, Texas
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Wille et al v. Cain et al
as 2:2009cv07469
Movant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
John Francis Wille and State of Louisiana
Defendant:
Burl Cain and Judith Walters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Bank of New York Trust Company, et al v. Scotia Pacific LLC, et al
as 09-40307
Debtor - (null):
In the Matter of: SCOPAC, SCOTIA DEVELOPMENT LLC, SALMON CREEK LLC and others
Appellant:
BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY NA, as Indenture trustee for the Timber Notes ("Indenture Trustee"), CSG INVESTMENTS, ANGELO, GORDON & COMPANY L.P. and others
Appellee:
PACIFIC LUMBER COMPANY, SCOTIA PACIFIC LLC, MARATHON STRUCTURED FINANCE FUND LP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
