Cases 21 - 30 of 76
Guy Barron v. Best Buy Company, Incorporated, et al
as 19-60817
Defendant / Appellee:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, L.L.C. and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GUY BARRON
Brian Kasangaki v. William Barr, et al
as 19-50810
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, ACTING SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ANDREW HURON, San Antonio Assistant Field Office Director for Pearsall Texas South Texas Detention Complex and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRIAN KASANGAKI
USA v. Francisco Lopez-Barron
as 19-20582
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANCISCO LOPEZ-BARRON, also known as Irenio Castro Barron
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
David Lancaster v. Harris County, et al
as 19-20445
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN TAYLOR, Deputy, JAMES H. COX, II, Deputy, JUDY WARNE, Judge, 257th District Court and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID L. LANCASTER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02226
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
FILING ERROR
as 7:2018mc00048
Material Witne:
Benny Williams Consulting, Inc.
Defendant:
COG Operating, LLC
Plaintiff:
Barron Wesley
Chow v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2017cv00865
Plaintiff:
Michelle Chow
Defendant:
Rick Baldwin , PEAG LLC , Eagle Private Capital LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Chow v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2017cv03056
Plaintiff:
Michelle Chow
Defendant:
Rick Baldwin , PEAG LLC , Eagle Private Capital LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00372
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
USA v. Welester Barron-Cavazo
as 16-41615
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WELESTER BARRON-CAVAZOS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
