Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Rodney Tow v. T. Bulmahn, et al
as 17-30077
Appellant:
RODNEY TOW
Appellee:
T. PAUL BULMAHN, LELAND TATE, ALBERT L. REESE, JR. and others
In re: Evaristus Mackey, Jr.
as 16-90020
Movant:
In re: EVARISTUS B. MACKEY, JR., also known as Reginald Fountain, also known as Reese Mackey
USA v. Evaristus Mackey, Jr.
as 16-30544
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EVARISTUS B. MACKEY, JR., also known as Reginald Fountain, also known as Reese Mackey
Frfgtr Pension & Relief Fund, et al v. T. Bulmahn, et al
as 15-31094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brian M. Neiman, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, William Kruse, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Moshe Issac Foundation, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Albert L. Reese, Jr., Keith R. Godwin, Leland E. Tate and others
Frfgtr Pension & Relief Fund, et al v. T. Bulmahn, et al
as 15-31094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN M. NEIMAN, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MOSHE ISSAC FOUNDATION and WILLIAM KRUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
T. PAUL BULMAHN, ALBERT L. REESE, JR., KEITH R. GODWIN and others
Reese v. Consolidated Credit Counseling Services, Inc.
as 5:2015cv00397
Defendant:
Consolidated Credit Counseling Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sherry Reese
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 - Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Janvey v. Adams & Reese L L P
as 3:2014mc00035
Plaintiff:
Ralph S Janvey
Defendant:
Adams & Reese L L P and Breazeale Sachse & Wilson L L P
Movant:
State of Louisiana
In re: Evaristus Mackey, Jr.
as 14-30927
Movant:
In re: EVARISTUS B. MACKEY, JR., also known as Reginald Fountain, also known as Reese Mackey
USA v. James Reese, Jr.
as 14-20421
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES CLAUDE REESE, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
