Cases 21 - 30 of 108
R.J. Reynolds v. FDA
as 23-60128
Petitioner:
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, RJR Vapor Company, L.L.C., Avail Vapor Texas, L.L.C. and others
Respondent:
United States Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
State of Texas v. Becerra
as 23-10246
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists and Christian Medical & Dental Associations
Defendant / Appellant:
Xavier Becerra, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
The State of Texas v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 7:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
The State of Texas and Mayo Pharmacy, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra and United States Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
FILING ERROR
as 1:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
The State of Texas
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra and United States Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
R J Reynolds Tobacco v. FDA
as 23-40076
Plaintiff / Appellee:
R J Reynolds Tobacco Company, Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Incorporated, ITG Brands LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Food & Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Stephen M. Hahn, Commissioner of Food and Drugs and others
Texas Medical Association et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, LLC, Dr. Adam Corley and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Personnel Management, Department of Labor and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Society of Anesthesiologists, American College of Radiology, American College of Emergency Physicians and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
R.J. Reynolds Vapor v. FDA
as 23-60037
Petitioner:
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, RJR Vapor Company, L.L.C., Avail Vapor Texas, L.L.C. and others
Respondent:
Food & Drug Administration, Robert Califf, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the United States Food & Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
State of Louisiana v. Becerra
as 22-30748
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Louisiana, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health & Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children & Families and others
State of Texas v. Becerra
as 22-11037
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists and Christian Medical & Dental Associations
Defendant / Appellant:
Xavier Becerra, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Texas Medical Association et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2022cv00372
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, LLC and Dr. Adam Corley
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lifenet, Inc. and East Texas Air One
Consolidated Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. Department of Labor and others
Amicus Curiae:
Physicians Advocacy Institute, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Congress of Neurological Surgeons and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
