Cases 31 - 40 of 77
Larry Lewis v. Jerry Goodwin, et al
as 19-30250
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY LEWIS
Defendant / Appellee:
JERRY GOODWIN, KAYLA SHERMAN, DOCTOR HEARNE and others
Scott Fields v. City of Sherman, Texas, et al
as 19-40003
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT FIELDS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SHERMAN, TEXAS, ZACH FLORES, BRANDON SHELBY and others
USA v. Sherman Sutton
as 18-10811
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SHERMAN RAY SUTTON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Sherman Lodge #2280 Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks et al
as 4:2018cv00316
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Sherman Lodge #2280 Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks, Larry Marshall, Leasa Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
Jeffrey Baron v. Daniel Sherman, et al
as 18-10182
Appellant:
JEFFREY BARON
Appellee:
DANIEL J. SHERMAN, MUNSCH, HARDT, KOPF & HARR, P.C. and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Sherman et al v. Ace Cash Express, Inc.
as 4:2017cv02357
Plaintiff:
Donald Sherman , Brenda Green , Felicia Debro and others
Defendant:
Ace Cash Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00372
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Danahar v. HMS Holdings Corp et al
as 3:2017cv01339
Plaintiff:
Mary Danahar
Defendant:
HMS Holdings Corp , William C Lucia and Jeffrey S Sherman
Movant:
David Conine
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Floyd Wilcox & Sons Inc v. Fairway Produce Distribution LLC et al
as 3:2016cv03238
Plaintiff:
Floyd Wilcox & Sons Inc
Defendant:
Thomas D Huffhines, Jr , Fairway Produce Distribution LLC , Sherman C Labarba and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
