Cases 31 - 40 of 292
USA v. Smith
as 22-30234
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Tyrone Larry Smith, also known as Marques Stewart, also known as Tyrone Letron Smith, also known as Tyrone Latron Smith, also known as Tyrone L. Smith, also known as Troy Green, also known as Antoine Lavell Franklin, also known as Michael Mummadd, al
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Tony L Franklin and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Krystal Simmons, Justin C Sand-Wable and Rocky N Moore
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Amite County, Mississippi et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 5:2021cv00097
Plaintiff:
Amite County, Mississippi, City of Brookhaven, Mississippi, City of Columbia, Mississippi and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Franklin v. United States
as 21-11104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Franklin
Defendant / Appellee:
United States, Charles Rettig, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Michael Pompeo and others
Clearman v. Kochanowski
as 21-20518
Appellant:
Scott M. Clearman, individually and on behalf of The Clearman Law Firm, P.L.L.C.
Appellee:
Andrew Jack Kochanowski, individually and on behalf of Sommers Schwartz, P.C., Eric Franklin Citron, individually and on behalf of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., Jeffrey West Burnett, individually and on behalf of Jeffery W. Burnett, P.C. and others
USA v. Johnson
as 21-40713
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Franklin Johnson, Jr.
Jones v. Lamar County et al
as 4:2021cv00156
Defendant:
Deputy Anson Amis, Deputy P Easterwood, Deputy Courtney Womack and others
Plaintiff:
Patty Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Navarro-Galves
as 21-40696
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Franklin Navarro-Galves, also known as Francisco Nava-Galves
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
