Cases 31 - 40 of 811
Laccinole v. Norwex USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv04167
Plaintiff:
Christopher Laccinole
Defendant:
Norwex USA, Inc. and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
BluRoc, LLC et al v. Foberg et al
as 2:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
BluRoc, LLC and Yak Access, LLC
Defendant:
Benjamin Foberg, Justin Lavoie and John Does 1-15
Harris v. Western Dental Services Inc et al
as 4:2023cv01051
Plaintiff:
Delisa M. Harris
Defendant:
Western Dental Services, Inc., Brident Services, LLC and John Does 1-10 4:23-cv-1051-P
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ellis v. Capital One Auto Finance
as 23-30500
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eric L. Ellis
Defendant / Appellee:
Capital One Auto Finance, Lorenza Dewayne Levy, Jr., Fisher Nixon and others
Alford v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc., et al.
as 4:2023cv00813
Plaintiff:
John R. Alford
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. and John Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Cacho v. United Tax Defense LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cacho
Defendant:
United Tax Defense LLC, Gary Craig and John Does 1-18
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
v. Salaiz et al
as 3:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Erik Salaiz
Defendant:
Legal Tax Defense, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
