Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Haden v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv00812
Plaintiff:
Nedah L. Haden
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation , Bank of America NA , Banc of America Investment Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc v. Cooney
as 4:2010mc00520
Plaintiff:
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc
Defendant:
Jason John Cooney
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc v. Cooney
as 4:2010cv05081
Plaintiff:
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc
Defendant:
Jason John Cooney
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Michael J. Maher v. Merrill Lynch & Co, Inc et al
as 4:2010cv03076
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch & Co, Inc , AIG Financial Products Corp. and AIG Financial Products, LLC
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Maher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
United States of America v. Howard et al
as 7:2010cv00080
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ricky Dale Howard
Garnishee:
Nocona General Hospital, Wells Fargo Bank, NA , Primevest Financial Services and others
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Cellular South, Inc. v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00081
Plaintiff:
Cellular South, Inc. and Cellular South, Inc.
Defendant:
Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. and John Does A-J
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Kenneth Dean v. Merrill Lynch, et al
as 10-20058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH E. DEAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MERRILL LYNCH, UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES INC, also known as UBS Painewebber Inc, UBS PAINEWEBBER INC and others
Lavin et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv02440
Plaintiff:
Richard Lavin, Richard Lavin, Simmie Cooper and others
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporation, Keith Orlin Crump and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK
as 4:2009cv03744
Movant:
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith
Respondent:
FIRST NATIONAL BANK
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Comprehensive Investment Services, Inc. v. Mudd et al
as 4:2009cv01444
Plaintiff:
Comprehensive Investment Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel H. Mudd, Robert J. Levin, Stephen M. Swad and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
