Cases 41 - 50 of 307
NetChoice v. Paxton
as 21-51178
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NetChoice, L.L.C., a 501(c)(6) District of Columbia organization doing business as NetChoice and Computer & Communications Industry Association, a 501(c) (6) non-stock Virginia Corporation doing business as CCIA
Defendant / Appellant:
Ken Paxton, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Texas
Amicus Curiae:
Texas Public Policy Foundation, Babylon Bee LLC, Giganews, Incorporated and others
Not Classified By Court:
Not the Bee LLC and Leonid Goldstein
Fisher v. Saul
as 21-11124
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Norris Lynn Fisher
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, NFN McMamee, Account Representative; Employee and Unknown Defendants, Security Administration, Washington and Fort Worth
In re: Darrel Vannoy
as 21-30671
Petitioner:
In re: Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, in his official capacity, Stephanie Lamartiniere, Assistant Warden for Health Services, in her official capacity, James M. LeBlanc, Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Corrections, in his official capacity and others
Respondent:
Kentrell Parker, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Farrell Sampier, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Reginald George and others
Texas Medical Association et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2021cv00425
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association and Dr. Adam Corley
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Labor, United States Department of Treasury and others
Amicus Curiae:
Physicians Advocacy Institute, California Medical Association, Connecticut State Medical Society and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Lamb v. Washington
as 21-11064
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jason Bradley Lamb, Amanda Florez Lamb, I. L. L. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Carist Latrice Washington, O.S., State of Texas and others
Star v. Mayorkas
as 21-50963
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Edos Star
Defendant / Appellee:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Ur M. Jaddou, Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Washington DC, Department of Homeland Security, National Benefit Center Lee's Summit, Missouri and others
Greenwood v. Cottonwood Financial LTD et al
as 3:2021cv02459
Plaintiff:
Jamie Greenwood
Defendant:
Cottonwood Financial LTD, Cottonwood Financial Wisconsin LLC, Cottonwood Financial Arizona LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chavez v. Rudes
as 21-10986
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Juan Pablo Chavez, doing business as Fine Arts Education Reform, also known as Chief Maestro Chavez, also known as Chief Maestro
Defendant / Appellee:
Scott Rudes, in his individual capacity and official capacity as Treasurer of the Arts Schools Network and Principal of Booker T. Washington High School for the Performing and Visual Arts, John Does 1-9 and Jane Does 1-9
Earl v. Boeing
as 21-40720
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Damonie Earl, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Linda Rugg, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Alesa Beck, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Boeing Company and Southwest Airlines Company
Amicus Curiae:
Washington Legal Foundation, National Association of Manufacturers, Product Liability Advisory Council, Incorporated and others
NetChoice LLC et al v. Paxton
as 1:2021cv00840
Plaintiff:
NetChoice LLC a 501(c)(6) District of Columbia organization doing business as NetChoice and Computer & Communications Industry Association a 501(c)(6) non-stock Virginia Corporation doing business as CCIA
Defendant:
Ken Paxton
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Progress, The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, The American Civil Liberties Union and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
