Cases 51 - 57 of 57
Citadel Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Sebelius
as 3:2010cv01077
Plaintiff:
Citadel Healthcare Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Artex Medical, Inc v. Sebelius
as 5:2010cv00084
Plaintiff:
Artex Medical, Inc
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2616
Medical Center Pharmacy, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 10-50031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MEDICAL CENTER PHARMACY, APPLIED PHARMACY, COLLEGE PHARMACY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN ASHCROFT, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL, In his official capacity as Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, ERIC H HOLDER, JR., In his official capacity as Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary, HHS, In her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services and others
Solaris Hospice Inc v. Sebelius
as 4:2009cv00691
Plaintiff:
Solaris Hospice Inc and Solaris Hospice Inc
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Transyd Enterprises, L.L.C. dba Transpro Medical Transport v. Sebelius
as 7:2009cv00292
Plaintiff:
Transyd Enterprises, L.L.C. dba Transpro Medical Transport
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2005 Review of Agency Action-HHS
Whittington v. United States of America et al
as 3:2009cv00940
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Whittington
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Texas Clinical Labs, Inc., et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary, et al
as 09-10658
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEXAS CLINICAL LABS INC, TEXAS CLINICAL LABS-GULF DIVISION INC, ESTATE OF DANIEL P CAMPBELL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS and CHARLES E. JOHNSON, Acting Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
