Cases 61 - 70 of 189
William Alexander v. Steven Harris, et al
as 19-50157
Defendant / Appellee:
LISA M. BIRNEL, CO IV, Correctional Officer, JOHN E. RITTER, Lieutenant of Corrections, ERVING JENSEN, Investigator III and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM P. ALEXANDER
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC v. Hamilton
as 1:2019cv00060
Defendant:
Michelle Hamilton
Plaintiff:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Daniel Ostrander v. Christopher Lindsey, et al
as 19-50032
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT HUGHES UNIT DANIEL PARKER, ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, WARDEN JOHN WERNER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL OSTRANDER
Hamilton v. McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc.
as 6:2018cv00521
Defendant:
McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Terry Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MCI Communications Svc Inc., et al v. Arlington Telephone Company, et al
as 18-10774
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INCORPORATED and VERIZON SELECT SERVICES INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
ARLINGTON TELEPHONE COMPANY, BLAIR TELEPHONE COMPANY, EASTERN NEBRASKA TELEPHONE COMPANY and others
Hamilton v. ARA Inc
as 3:2018cv00863
Defendant:
ARA Inc
Plaintiff:
Denise Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02937
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00927
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bagheri v. Felcor Lodging Trust Inc et al
as 3:2017cv01892
Plaintiff:
Judy G Bagheri
Defendant:
Felcor Lodging Trust Inc , Felcor Lodging Limited Partnership, Thomas J Corcoran, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
