Cases 61 - 70 of 103
Gibson et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00007
Plaintiff:
Beverly Sue Gibson , Lonnie Dale Gibson , Chrystie Palomo and others
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Claudia Ocoro, et.al. vs. Armando Montelongo, Jr., et.al.
as 5:2016cv01278
Plaintiff:
Claudia Ocoro, Kassa Eden, Jemila Weldenhawayat and others
Defendant:
Armando Montelongo, Jr, Armando Montelongo, Jr., Real Estate Training International, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
NEVILLE v. YANG et al
as 5:2016cv01231
Respondent:
ASH CARTER, General FRANK J. GRASS, Deborah L. James and others
Petitioner:
TINA NEVILLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Terry Nichol
as 16-11421
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TERRY RYAN NICHOLS, also known as "Buster"
USA v. Dustin Nichol
as 16-50682
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
DUSTIN RAY NICHOLS, also known as Dustin Nichols
Verdin v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03986
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c. and others
Plaintiff:
Nichol Verdin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701
USA v. Samantha Goodale
as 16-50420
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SAMANTHA NICOLE HOUSTON GOODALE, also known as Samantha Nichole Houston Goodale
Nichols v. USAA Savings Bank
as 5:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
Nichols and Michael Nichols
Defendant:
USAA Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
USA v. James Nichol
as 15-41649
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES DOUGLAS NICHOLS
USA v. Christine Estrada
as 15-10915
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTINE NICHOLE ESTRADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
