Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gonzalez v. Goldfarb et al
as 4:2023cv01670
Plaintiff:
Janet L. Gonzalez
Defendant:
MD David Goldfarb, Laura Ceballos, Daisy Salmeron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Filed in Error
as 4:2023cv01507
Plaintiff:
Kerry Brown, Krushial K. Productions and Incorrectly filed
Defendant:
Roc Nation, LLC, Lenny Santiago, SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Foster v. Fisher et al
as 3:2022cv06133
Plaintiff:
Billy Foster
Defendant:
Latondra McCoy Fisher and Kerry Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Credit Human Federal Credit Union v. Fruge
as 2:2022cv05702
Defendant:
Sharon Lee Nothnagel, Kerry Anderson, Mark Herford and others
Plaintiff:
Credit Human Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
USA v. Tate
as 22-30229
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Kerry Tate
Ray v. Bingham
as 21-40755
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jerremy Raschaad Ray
Defendant / Appellee:
Matt Bingham, Smith County District Attorney, Bryan Jiral, Prosecutor, Smith County, O W Loyd, Public Defender and others
Glenn v. Tyson Foods
as 21-40622
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Rolandette Glenn, Idell Bell, Kerry Cartwright and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Tyson Foods, Incorporated, Jason Orsak, Erica Anthony and others
Bourlet v. Taishan Gypsum Company
as 21-30364
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Bourlet, Howard C. Jones and Gregory Cross
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Greater NOLA Homes, L.L.C. and Barbara Alfonso
Defendant / Appellee:
Taishan Gypsum Company, Limited, formerly known as Shandong Taihe Dongxin Company, Limited
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Kerry Barre
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
