Cases 1 - 10 of 763
Clark et al v. Mangham et al
as 5:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Mr & Mrs Larry E Clark and L & M Hair Care Products Inc
Defendant:
Mangham Hardy Rolfs & Abadie, Terrence J Donahue, Sr, Charles McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Kaul v. Texas Medical Board et al
as 3:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Richard Arjun Kaul
Defendant:
Texas Medical Board, New Jersey Board of Medical Examiners, Steven Lomazow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
EnvTech, Inc. v. DeBusk
as 3:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
EnvTech, Inc.
Defendant:
patrick andrew debusk
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Thiels v. Berger et al
as 4:2024cv01668
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thiels
Defendant:
William J. Berger, Robert L. Lane, Nora Mead Brownell and others
G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. JNJ's Vintage Retro Boutique LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
JNJ's Vintage Retro Boutique LLC doing business as JNJ's Vintage, Jose Andrew Mercado doing business as JNJ's Vintage and Jennifer F. Mercado doing business as JNJ's Vintage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1131 ca Federal Question: Federal Communications Act
Lynn v. Kaiser Foundation Hospital et al
as 4:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Pamela Lynn and Wilson Lynn Jr
Defendant:
Kaiser Foundation Hospital, JAMS Endispute, Inc., successor to Judicial Arbitration & Mediation Services, Inc., Greg Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Highland Employee Retention Assets LLC v. Dondero et al
as 3:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Highland Employee Retention Assets LLC
Defendant:
James Dondero, Mark Okada, Mark Katz and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
